Norwegian goes the American way...

That was a surprise this morning - it was long rumored that Norwegian is one of the airlines that already committed for the B737MAX (100 firm orders plus 100 purchase rights in addition to a follow-on order for 200 B737-800NG), in that case the -8 model. But that they also would order the A320neo (MoU for 100 aircraft plus 50 purchase rights) could not have been expected.
There are two possible explanations that come to my mind as reasons for that decisions to go away from a single-type fleet:

1. They went the AA way (of negotiating), meaning they negotiated with both Airbus and Boeing until they got a deal from both they could not resist to close them both.
2. Their anticipated growth is too large that one of the OEM's could deliver aircraft fast enough to satisfy that growth.

On the other hand it is a little bit discussable if a mixed fleet of B737-800NG and B737MAX-8 would be a single-fleet type anyway. The engines (CFM56-7BE and LEAP-1B) do not have anything in common and Boeing itself talks about 85% commonality between the NG and the MAX. So Norwegian would have had a two-type fleet anyway until the last -800NG would have been phased out. Now that Norwegian gets aircraft from both Airbus and Boeing the last -800NG will be phased out earlier so that the (at that scale) marginally higher costs through having a two-type fleet will be (probably) more than offset by the lower fuel costs.

The next interesting question will be the engine choice for the A320neo. Although the selection of the LEAP-1A to complement the LEAP-1B on the MAX-8 fleet would be the most logical choice, they maybe also go the AA way and buy from both engine manufacturers, like AA did it recently for their A319 (CFM56) and A321 (V2500). So the PW1100G could come into play - the factsheet that Norwegian provided with their press release shows the fan diameter of the PW1100G (81"), but that does not necessarily say anything...

CFM power

Scott Hamilton has a piece about how GE and CFM are able to win so many engine competitions and for that went deep into the Republic deal for 40 A319neo and 40 A320neo, to be equipped with the LEAP-1A.

After reading the story I went on and looked at a few public databases, where you can check out which airlines owns which aircraft, with which engines they are equipped and who is (eventually) the lessor of the aircraft.

I was interested in the airlines which already ordered the A320neo, but did not commit to an engine so far. Here are my findings and what they tell me:

1. GoAir: they have a firm order for 72 A320neo

Current fleet: 10 A320 powered by CFM56. They firmed up 10 options for the A320 (classic), no information which engine they choose for these, but I would guess CFM56.

GECAS leases 4 of these aircraft to GoAir.

So both CFM and GECAS have leverage for a deal to sell the LEAP-1A to GoAir. CFM could reduce spare parts pricing for the existing CFM56 and GECAS could lower lease rates.

Now GoAir is reportedly also interested in the CSeries and could announce a deal in July or August.

That gives P&W a leverage to struck a combined deal here, as the PW1524G is the sole engine for the CSeries.

Conclusion: Tie! Everything is possible!

2. Jetblue: Jetblue has a MoU for 40 A320neo

Current fleet: 118 A320 with V2500, 49 E190 with CF34-10E

GECAS leases 13 A320 as well as 35 E190 to Jetblue

At first glance, P&W should have better cards, if one just looks at the A320 engines, but GECAS tries to get a hold here with more leases.

MTU does the MRO for the engines on a power-by-the-hour basis, so they could be involved in a deal for placing the PW1133G on the A320neo's for Jetblue.

Conclusion: It's P&W's to loose - and that's the chance of CFM!

3. Avianca TACA: they have a MoU for 33 A320neo

Current fleet: 42 A320 powered by CFM (mostly Avianca), 30 A320 powered by V2500 (+20 on order)

GECAS leases 14 aircraft to Avianca TACA.

GE has a dedicated MRO shop for the CFM56-5 in Brasil.

Conclusion: CFM's to loose. They have clearly more to throw into that deal.

4. LAN/TAM: 20 firm oders (LAN) + MoU for 22 (TAM)

The airlines are in a merger process.

Current fleet: Large A320 family fleet, powered both by the V2500 and the CFM56 - LAN selected the CFM56 last year for a further 50 A320.

GECAS leases 23 aircraft, mostly to TAM.

MTU is providing MRO for the V2500 at TAM.

Conclusion: Close call! CFM and GECAS have slightly more leverage...

5. Garuda Indonesia/Citilink: MoU for 10 A320neo + 25 Options

Current fleet: 78 B737 (Classics and NG) with CFM56

GECAS leases 40 B737 to Garuda.

Conclusion: CFM can hardly loose this one!

6. Transasia: 6 A321neo on firm order

Current fleet: 2 A320 and 5 A321 powered by V2500, 7 ATR powered by PW127

Conclusion: P&W can hardly loose here!

And now look at some prospective customers:

1. Delta Air Lines

Current fleet:

• GE engines are on 105 aircraft
• CFM engines are on 209 aircraft
• GECAS leases14 aircraft to Delta
• PW engines are on 355 aircraft
• IAE engines are on 27 aircraft with 13 more to come (MD-90)

Most PW engines will go away with the replacement (the last DC-9's and the MD-80's), so the P&W leverage is not that big as it looks.

Conclusion: a deciding factor could be the engine commonality with a possible CSeries order!

2. American Airlines

Current fleet:

• GE engines are on 73 aircraft and will be on the 6 ordered B777-300ER
• CFM engines are on 154 aircraft and 54 more ordered B737-800
• GECAS leases 61 aircraft to AA
• PW engines are on the 229 MD-80's, which will then disappear

Conclusion: never heard so far that AA is interested in the CSeries, so this is CFM's to loose.

3. Air France/KLM

Current fleet:

• GE engines are on 146 aircraft
• CFM engine are on 210 aircraft
• GECAS leases just one aircraft to AF/KLM (is that right?)

Conclusion: hopeless for P&W, M. Sarkozy will never let AirFrance order an engine without french content if there is one available.

COC and DOC Part III

Today I discovered a very interesting website: The "Airline Data Project" from MIT.
There is a lot of airline data from all major american airlines in that database. From that data you can easily pull DOC and COC's and compare airline to airline, a specific airline though the years or whatever you want to find out.
Let us have a look at two typical carriers:

• American Airlines as the typical legacy carrier
• Southwest Airlines as the typical low cost carrier

I looked at two years - the first available (1995) and the one with the highest fuel prices (2008).
In 1995 the price for aircraft fuel was relatively stable at about $0.50 per gallon - unbelievably low for us today.
Im early 2008 the price already was in the region of $2.70, then climbing to almost $4.50 in July before falling rapidly to a low of about $1.00 in December 2008.

Here is the chart for American Airlines in 1995.

The cost for fuel and oil is $429 per block hour - 26% of the total cost.

We get a whole different picture for the year 2008.

Now American Airlines has to pay $2771 per block hour for fuel - a stunning 60% of the total, although the amount of fuel consumed per block hour went down from 957 to 940 gallons. This only slight decline in fuel burn shows why American now accelerated their B737-800 deliveries in the last two years. The MD-80 is fuel thirsty.

And now here is Southwest Airlines. The trend is the same:

In 1995 fuel cost were at 30% of direct operating costs. But the dollar value is about 13% less than the $492 paid by AA, as Southwest just burned 773 gallons per block hour and the total costs per flight hour were 14% lower at SWA.

And here are the SWA numbers for 2008:

 Fuel and oil costs are above 50%, but total costs are less than 60% of the costs of AA. Fuel burn per block hour was down by 9% compared to 1995 at 705 gallons, the rest of the difference is probably explainable by better fuel hedging at SWA.

I think from these charts we can understand the desire from many airlines to get more fuel efficient aircraft as soon as possible.