tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post1336665266215194039..comments2024-01-17T13:23:35.896-05:00Comments on aeroturbopower: Airbus converting ceo to neo, Boeing looking for NG salesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post-17230604778024800202023-12-29T05:00:17.426-05:002023-12-29T05:00:17.426-05:00Lovely bloog you have hereLovely bloog you have hereReiyacchihttps://reiyacchi.tumblr.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post-32071273664912195672014-08-29T03:54:33.213-04:002014-08-29T03:54:33.213-04:00The fuel burn difference will never be 30%. I only...The fuel burn difference will never be 30%. I only said that teh SFC difference at takeoff eill be in the range of 30%. And a part of that will be negated by the weight increase of the neo/Max aircraft.aeroturbopowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17686461923667604678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post-82784426534093110872014-08-28T11:22:22.486-04:002014-08-28T11:22:22.486-04:00If that is correct (up to 30% on short trips) then...If that is correct (up to 30% on short trips) then is even more of a compelling choice for airlines to switch to the newer models. If I was an Airline CEO, someone would have to prove very convincingly that taking any of the A320CEO or B737NG 2 or 3 years from now will be a sound decision for my company. Of course price might have a lot to do with it, but it will have to be real good. Just imaging you flying an aircraft for 10 years while another airline is flying the same aircraft with new engines for the same 10 years and potentially a combine 20% better SFC per trip. You can sell your available seats to costumer for 15% less money and still make a little more than your competition for the same trip. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post-47866988469268885872014-08-27T04:19:39.012-04:002014-08-27T04:19:39.012-04:00The 15% fuel burn difference applies to cruise fli...The 15% fuel burn difference applies to cruise flight conditions. The SFC difference between the ceo and neo engines at takeoff is even larger, more like 30%, so on shorter routes the fuel burn advantage could be even higher.aeroturbopowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17686461923667604678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post-18593488946899860582014-08-27T00:01:40.667-04:002014-08-27T00:01:40.667-04:00Fuel costs are certainly a big factor but that 15%...Fuel costs are certainly a big factor but that 15% may not apply to all routes. As well engine maintenance costs will increase with the neo and maxxAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8118460937928958757.post-51949850293530801942014-08-25T13:10:57.641-04:002014-08-25T13:10:57.641-04:00Thanks for this update AeroT. I doubt that all th...Thanks for this update AeroT. I doubt that all this A320 CEO will be delivered (as well as that many B737s). the 15% difference in fuel efficiency is just huge on an airplane of this size. The next year an a half both OEM might do well with the current backlog of CEOs and NGs, but once other airlines start to realize the impact of the new A320 when placed head to head with one of its kind, something will have to give. IMHO, it will first happen to Airbus as the NEO is coming about two years earlier, but then it will move over to Boeing camp. If I was an airline receiving the current airplane from either company in tree years, I would either ask for a major discount or I will just move over to the better product.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com